Saturday, September 26, 2009
Women Talk
Friday, August 21, 2009
A day at the RTO and my first time driving..in INDIA! whoohoo
Sunday, January 25, 2009
To Err is Human?
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Checks & Balances - Apparently not applicable to the Bush Administration
example amongst many others of the Bush Administration’s open defiance of the American Constitution.
Beginning in 2004, American’s became aware of the torture and abuse that
the prisoners in the Abu Ghraib correctional facility were going through. Even
more outrageous is the fact that the commander of Abu Ghraib, Janice Karpinski, during
the Abu Ghraib trials bought out in open the fact that 90% of the detainees in the
prison were innocent. It is one thing to use harsh torture techniques on actual suspects
but quite another when using them on innocent civilians. Horrible atrocities were
inflicted upon these prisoners including urinating on detainees, sodomization of
detainees, forcing the prisoners to be naked and perform sexual acts and waterboarding
to name just a few. Former Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld advised President
Bush to pass the infamous memo that allowed the U.S. to suspend the Geneva
Conventions at any point it so deemed necessary claiming that it needed to be done
since the U.S. was fighting a “war against terrorism”.
“The War Powers Act” passed in 1973 clearly states that
Congress must be involved and made aware about any war related proceedings
including interrogation of detainees. Clearly the Bush Administration did not think it was
necessary to involve the Congress since Rumsfeld and Bush were allowing grievous
acts to be enforced upon prisoners (most of them innocent) at Abu Ghraib. Following
the Abu Ghraib trials the Senate passed a detainee Bill which introduced new rules
relating to the treatment of prisoners kept in detainee camps. It was approved 65 to 34.
Although it made several interrogation techniques illegal it still gave the President
power to decide if harsher techniques needed to be implemented. Also, no detainee
whether innocent or guilty was going to be able to question their detention in court i.e.
they were not given the right to Habeas Corpus and due to this every prisoner held at
these camps would have to undergo a trial, innocent or guilty. So even though the
Senate had passed this Bill, its effectiveness was highly questionable. Only as of March
2008, in Boumediene v. Bush was this right given back to the prisoners.
I do believe that President Bush ignored the boundaries of the Presidency. The
framers certainly did not intend for innocent civilians to suffer in detainee camps
and have Habeas Corpus stripped from them. My stance is that terrorism must be punished at all costs but the innocent should not have to suffer. Hillary Clinton rightfully
mentioned in one of her interviews the fact that while the US is engaged in a war on terrorism, it must conduct itself in an honorable manner even when faced with extremely trying circumstances.
Obama now faces a serious challenge in trying to initiate an accurate
solution to the treatment of detainees kept in prison camps. He has pledged that he will
close the detention center at Guantanamo Bay but is still very vague as to what will become of the detainees. McCain had planned on moving them to the United States and have them tried using the Pentagons Commission but since Obama's Presidential victory all focus is on what he has in mind. Obama is of the opinon that the Bush
Administration’s methods have been an utter failure and that there was no reason to
hold the detainees back in those camps to begin with. He believes that the legal
system in America is strong enough to carry out the trials of terrorism suspects devoid of any external influences. Touche.
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Itna drama kyun hai bhai?

Everytime I watch a Bollywood movie I tell myself, NOMORE! I will have nothing more to do with all of that mindless ranting and raving about some crazy/warped love angle, a heroine desperately seeking love and an overly eager hero ready to comply! NOMORE! But then I like so many others find myself being lured again into this never ending saga of romance/drama that is Bollywood. The colors, the happy go lucky characters, the LOVE stories that in almost all cases are always a success are created to draw an audience like you and I. Try as you may with all your might to resist Bollywood, it will in some way, shape or form came back to haunt you. You say you dislike Bollywood now, ok..ever think about someone you knew from the past, an ex?, a sweety you parted ways with, an evening of fun and frolick with friends? Think about any of the aforementioned people especially when you hear a certain song? That my friends is the power of Bollywood. Love it. Hate it. Either ways it’ll never let you go. You can run but you can’t hide. Now, I'm not saying that everything Bollywood is drama filled and a waste of time. No. Not at all. There are some truly memorable movies that are made in India, the romance kind or otherwise and are a must watch. However, all logical reasoning and thoughts must be put aside before watching some of them. My only problem with these movies is the false notion of life/love that they inculcate within the minds of the very impressionable youth. They say art imitates life, not so in your average Bollywood "masala" film. Therefore, my issue in the past till date has been the effect they have on the average South Asian teenager (especially those who actually live there). Watching a typical commercial hindi flick certainly creates misleading ideas about what life and especially love is all about, for in these movies it's romancing in foreign and exotic locales and a relentless passion that never never fades away with the hero chasing the heroine and winning her heart against ALL odds (Veer Zaara, KKHH, HDDCS, QSQT, KANK, etc, etc ,etc and if you aren't able to make sense of the abbreviations you're clueless about B-Wood and don't really need to be reading this). Infact, being rather nonchalant about the opposite sex I was able to steer clear of all this Bollywood madness (watched but never let influence) even as a teen and often times found myself pondering over why even bother making movies that are so meaningless?...ofcourse at some point on a later day I will hear the melodious "tujhe dekha to yeh jaana sanam" play in the distance and figure if you can't beat em join em and so the show must go on or in this case as SRK aptly puts it "picture abhi baki hai!".